The most important part of this Keane note is the underlined words "no confirmed plumes".
I may choose, later on, to get into some detailed explanations describing why there aren't any plume deposits but for now simply take note of the fact "no confirmed plumes" is underlined, why is it underlined, because there are no confirmed plumes, zero, nadda.
This is total speculative fabricated conjecture.
Why does it matter?
Because of what I said on my Triton page and my Eruptions page.
Their theory is NINE ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE off from experimental reality, that's a billion times off.
A BILLION TIMES
This is how far out on a limb they are with this convection cell/conveyor belt theory.
But I'm supposed to believe this theory, no matter how bizarre, simply because they are scientists and they postulated it.
I'm supposed to believe this theory even though its a BILLION times off from experimental reality.
I used to think some of my theories were a bit difficult to accept but the degree of faith required to believe this theory is inconceivable.
This appears to be information that has already been noted both on this web site and in NASA released papers.
The evaporation of N2 into the atmosphere is seen as a fog along Pluto's terminator line.
The fog rises up along the eastern uplands at the Tombaugh Regio terrain to become adiabatically condensed creating pools within the uplands to such a degree that I prefer to refer to these uplands as the wetlands even though wetlands are typically at low elevations.